This just In...

da rattler
44
We are told that the new Dean of SBI will be:

Lydia McKinley-FloydPh.D. She is currently the associate dean of Savannah State's College of Business Administration. Has previously served as the dean of Chicago State's business school. She claims to have help to fundraise $10k to $40k from companies such as Citibank, IBM, and RJR Nabisco. Helped to raise over $1 million for a 2003 annual gala for Chicago State University. She has also worked at a variety of HBCUs. Eight published articles. She has a long list of funded research as well. Her corporate experience includes mostly 2 year stints at Merrill Lynch, Xerox, Southern Bell and First National Bank of Chicago.

Post a Comment

44Comments

  1. do you guys have a copy of her bio?

    ReplyDelete
  2. umm......... Did she move up the food chain while in corporate America?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well she didn't move up the food chain in Corp. Amer., but she certainly moved down the food chain in academia, from Dean to Assoc. Dean.

    ReplyDelete
  4. well she is moving up now...

    ReplyDelete
  5. A lot of hard luck folks moving up under Castell !!! But is this necessarily good for FAMU?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Delta?

    Eva C. Wanton = Savannah Alumni

    Go figure!

    ReplyDelete
  7. That's true, FAMU is becoming the land of opportunity for hard luck academics. We should place an inscription on the eternal flame that reads:

    Give me your lazy, your incompetent,
    Your arrogant JUCOs yearning for a university job,
    The wretched refuse from your payroll,
    Send this shiftless, deadweight to me,
    And I will fire better, more qualified employees to make room for them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous 7/15/2006 9:34 PM said... But is this necessarily good for FAMU?

    Is castell good for FAMU?

    'L NAW!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Who will be the law school dean?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Should we be surprised? We permitted the BOT to lower FAMU's academic leadership standards when we accepted two community college administrators as our presidents. Now we are simply paying the price. What was sown is now being reaped.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Questions: Why did she lose her job as dean at Chicago State?

    Was she one of the faithful followers of Delores Cross (the former Chicago State prez who then put the final nails in Morris Brown's coffin)?

    Why was an associate deanship the highest job she was able to secure after she left Chicago State?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Beeing a devil's advocate...it is possible that she moved for family reasons...but she is here now let's help her do what needs to be done and...make sure she doesn't have any guarantees in her contract for more than one year.

    ReplyDelete
  13. this lady isnt good enough...come on FAMU is this a joke or what! She is no Dr. Mobley...we can do a hell of a lot better! Where are the SBIans when you need them to chime in...

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is what I heard from another poster elsewhere. It matches what I thought could have been the possibility in my earlier post at 3:42:

    From what I understand she's an excellent choice!!!!!!!!!

    I spoke with two SBI Professors during the interview process and she was each preson's #1.

    They said she's very strong and that the IP or Provost couldn't hold a candle to the lady.

    She took the Sav. State job to be closer to her sickly Mother in the ATL., but looks like Moms will be relocating to Tallahassee.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah right! I was on the committee as well, and she was not my number one select.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Anonymous @ 3:42, WHY WOULD SHE LEAVE CLARK ATLANTA AND TAKE A POSITION AT SAVANNAH STATE?

    Seems to me, Clark Atlanta is much closer to Atlanta then Savannah State.

    ReplyDelete
  17. In the July 05 Posting, the draft Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes In Net Assets shows an "Adjustment to Beginning Net Assets" of negative $5,435,950. Can anyone tell why this adjustment was made? There are no similar adjustments in the two previous years.

    I'm hoping some of you SBIers can please explain this to me, because what the adjustment seems to do is lower the starting number so that the ending number looks better.

    Put another way, The Net Assets we started FY 2004-2005 with were reduced by $5.4-million, from $371,356,031 to $365,920,081. Without this adjustment, it would appear that the $2,736,119 Increase in Net Assets would have been a net Loss of $2,699,831! It would also appear that the administration is admitting that they overstated the financial situation last year by by $5.4-million.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If Castell & Co. weren't so hateful, it seems former SBI Professor and former SCState and former NCCU Provost Lucy Ruben would have been an excellent choice. Lucy is now a visiting professor at Duke. She knew better than to throw her hat in the ring for the SBI deanship because her former role as NCCU's Provost.

    ReplyDelete
  19. i understand the sentiments expressed on this site regarding the new sbi dean.
    was she the best candidate in the pool?
    i dont know if she was or not but it doesn't matter she is the dean now. it serves no purpose to questions her qualifications and how and why she was chosen. the best thing for us to do now is to lend her our support so that she can be the dean that she should be to lead us to the next level. lets not prejudge her. lets give her a chance and some space. she deserves our support not for her sake but for the sake of sbi.
    anyway she can't be any worse than the damn puppet we had, that mad dog who tore us apart who had no respect for anybody who did not kiss his ass.

    lets hope and pray that the new dean does not keep the old team as her associate and assistant deans. they are the ones who harbor so much hate they are behind every ugly thing that has happened to sbi. they go around threatening faculty members and abuse their power so lets hope they are sent packing and replaced by some other competent and constructive individuals.

    make your voice heard,sbians.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Dr. Lydia McKinley-Floyd
    Biography:
    Education
    BA & Masters in Political Science from University of Illinois, Chicago
    MBA from University of Chicago
    Ph.D. from Emory University.

    Most Recent Occupation
    Associate Dean of Savannah State University's College of Business Administration [which became AACSB accredited because of her work]

    Experience

    Former Dean of Chicago State University's School of Business [which went successfuly completed a similar accreditation process during her tenure]

    Former Director of the Urban Marketing Research Institute at Clark Atlanta University

    Corporate Experience: Merrill Lynch, Xerox, Southern Bell, and First National Bank of Chicago
    Scholarly Activity

    Eight (8) published articles
    Sample: Philantrophic Clubs by Elite African-American Women.


    Important facts:
    - Dr. McKinley-Floyd is a member of Delta Sigma Theta

    ReplyDelete
  21. Well as the best accounting teacher SBI ever had (Dr Sykes) taught me....Assets=Liabilites+Owner's Equity. Using this equation Owners equity (or Net Assets) equals to Assets-Liabilities. Basically the only way you can have a decline in Owner's equity is via a decline in assets or an increase in liabilites or some type of distribution (dividends for example), but even for that to happen (e.g. a distribution) there must be some offsetting entry to assets or liabilities to pay it. Assets can also decline via some sort of write-off or there was some recievable that was deemed uncollectible, but again there would have to be an offsetting entry to account for this.

    In essense for 2004 beginning net assets or better said ending net assets for 2003 to be revised downward, there must have been a loss or write off during 2003 that was either missed or not recorded. Companies revise financial statements all of the time, so its not too concerning to me if this is what "indeed" happened. However, just what that entry was to reduce net assets in the year 2003 is the question.

    ReplyDelete
  22. To anonymous @ 9:28am:

    Where can I find that bio of her?

    ReplyDelete
  23. As much as I do not have any love lost for the Bryant administration, I don't think it is because they are hateful that "the former SBI Professor and former SCState Dean and former NCCU Provost Lucy Ruben did not apply." You need to ask yourself why she left both SCState and NCCU before calling her an an excellent choice. It will be help for people to do some home work before they spit their vernum here. We are supposed to be educated. As an educated person, you owe it to yourself to speak from facts and not emotions.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Did u try to google her?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Lucy left SCState to become Provost at NCCU.
    I know she ran into a bit of a problem with the faculty of NCCU, who almost launched an all out revolt.

    As Dean of the S.C. State Business School she did get them accredited and grew the program.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It’s unfortunate to see so much negativity being put out before the new dean is given a chance to prove that she is competent and capable. What’s done is done. Now is the time for SUPPORT, not sideline commentary. On a larger scale, THAT IS THE ONLY WAY WE WILL EVER MOVE FORWARD AS A PEOPLE, BY SUPPORTING EACH OTHER, NOT BY PUTTING EACH OTHER DOWN. Let’s hear what she has to say, let’s hear her plans, let’s ask the right questions, questions that relate to the future of SBI. Negative energy/attitudes/thoughts give rise to negative results. Let’s not make this transition harder than it has to be for the students, faculty, & staff of SBI. It is in everyone’s best interest to bring her in with open arms, serve as HER support system, even more, let’s pray for her; so that she can guided, through support, to the right decisions and the right actions to better our school and inevitably, the university. Before posting comments, everyone please ask themselves: “How does my comment HELP the current situation”.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I agree we all must to be patient and give our new dean all the support we can before we judge her prematurely. It is more about saving SBI than anything else or her.

    But at the same time, as one of the visitors to RN wrote, "Watch out for the current associate dean and assistant dean." They are truly hateful people and they are poisonous. All they are concerned about is their personal gains. I fully agree that if these characters remain on the new dean's team, then we are done before there is any chance for SBI's recovery.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The fact still remains that no one at a Director's level and above should take a job under an interim administration, especially given the turmoil at FAMU. It would serve the University better to seat a permanent president and let that individual select its own provost which in turn would select the Deans, Directors and other key faculty to resume an effort to move the University forward.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anonymous said...7/17/2006 1:06 PM

    You are probably the same person that was preaching the ignorant babble about Castell and look where it landed us. Had we listened to those who knew Castell's track record, when would not be in the situation we find ourselves into today.

    FAMU IS NOT FOR ON THE JOB TRAINING!

    ReplyDelete
  30. All of you naysayers, why don't you bring your "A" game to the table along with our Master plan for straigthening out the mess that's been created in SBI by the former administration (and not under Dean Liverpool)! Sounds to me like you all are able to save the world, one "B" school at a time!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Agreed. The "wait and see" approach is one of the most deadly forms of failed accountability.
    Looking at her credentials it is obvious she does not have the experience to take SBI where it needs to go.
    She's raised a million, and a few thousand, we need people with the contacts to raise millions, and build an infastructure within SBI. I'd love to give her the benefit of the doubt, but I saw all the candidate profiles, and I know that if the Provost didn't put that "Hollin's Group" only requirement, she would've been lucky to get an interview from the larger pool of candidates.

    Lets hope that this is not a long term contract. Even though FAMU has a history of messing contracts up also (Gainous anyone?)

    ReplyDelete
  32. +++++++++
    +++++++++

    Some positive vibes to counteract all the negativity. To read all these posts, no one will ever be good enough.

    And the minute someone comes along with the the exact credentials of Sybil Mobley, some of you will cynically ask, "Why would anyone come to FAMU?"

    ++++++++++
    ++++++++++

    ReplyDelete
  33. SBI has been searching for a Dean for the last three years. I wonder where all these negative sayer have been all these years. At the rate these negative flags are flying, one would think that these people just woke up one day and found out that SBI does not have a Dean. Well, that is the FAMU way. People sleep when they should be speaking and speak when time has passed them. May be one day we will all learn to act like educated people.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Ask yourselves this, “where was I during the selection process”. If you didn’t place your vote then, please don’t place a vote now. All concerns posted thus far sound like concerns that should have been brought to the search committee prior to the final selection. THE POINT IS: It’s too late to bit@h and complain now. Those who were/are dissatisfied should’ve made efforts to have her removed from the list of finalist. BUT YOU DIDN’T (Just like black people, wanna chime in their opinions after the fact). YOU DON’T MOVE FORWARD BY TAKING STEPS BACK. What’s even more interesting is that no one, other than the person earlier, has yet to make any comments on how they think the new dean could better SBI; or what you think her plan should be; what should be her first step? I’ll I’ve read thus far is bashing on top of bashing. I wonder, is it really in our hearts to see SBI succeed? Now think before you answer that, because you may not have anything to bash! Better yet, I’m sure someone would find a way!

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous at 7/17/2006 3:26 PM,

    This whole dean search was rigged.

    Give me a break. The masses have been running the flag up and down the pole; sending smoke signals and even threatened a press conference. None of this would have made a difference.

    When the IP and the provost sent strick instructions to forward only the names of the candidates from the Hollins Group this is what you get.

    Peace!

    ReplyDelete
  36. The search may have been rigged, but at least it produced a candidate that has been named the Dean of SBI. I wonder where most of you were when SBI conducted three earlier searches two of which produced finalist without any appointments. May be Dr. Gainous was like some of you, looking for an angel to lead SBI. at least we should applaud the Provost for making a decision. Only time will tell if the decision is the right one. One thing is sure. Members of the Dean Screening committee as a group classified Dr. McKinly-Floyd as the top of the candidates they screened and interviewed.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Yeah, out of the five candidates selected by the Hollins Group. I am really troubled by some of these comments.

    If a real search and screening was allowed without the administration trying to facilitate a pre-determined outcome I don't think there would be so much bashing of these candidates.

    But you got to wonder, how in the hell can we continue to operate like this and expect to get away with it?

    Very soon this house of cards will come crumbling down on the butts of those who have stuck their heads into the sand and others like me as well.


    At $258,000 are we getting the best candidates out there using the Hollins Group?

    As far as CC Provost Debra Austin, you have gotta to be kidding. Look at how CB searched and screened for Austin's position of provost.

    This faculty would have never selected her as their peer or academic chief.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Wow 39 (now 40) posts... This blog is becoming more popular than the Democrat message board.

    ReplyDelete
  39. "why don't you bring your "A" game to the table for straigthening out the mess that's been created in SBI by the former administration (and not under Dean Liverpool)!"
    7/17/2006 2:32 PM

    Wow! where is your head buried, pal? Inside Liverpool's arse? Must be!

    Take a deep breath before you go to bat for Liverpool. He brought his A game to the table and now we are buried under his table with him standing on it and looking down on us as a bunch of cabbage patch dolls. Is this what you call A game?

    Be real, pal!

    ReplyDelete
  40. I truly support the idea of broad and comprehensive education, to the extent that I sometimes tend to consider people with highly specialized degrees a little unimaginative or narrow-minded.

    On the other hand, lots of FAMU faculty are living in fear or have been unemployed because they have been told their doctorates are not in the "proper" areas.

    It will be interesting to see how this Dean views that whole issue of "proper" academic credentials, because her Ph.D. is in "Interdisciplinary Studies" which does not show up on the Emory University website as having any connection to the Ph.D. programs of their Business school!

    ReplyDelete
  41. Response to Anonymous 11:09 pm July 19.

    A broad comprehensive education is good and very important. However, it is important to understand that how ‘broad’ is viewed in academia from teaching credentialing perspective is very different from how it is viewed in business or other organizations.

    Many businesses hire people from all sorts of background because, what they are hiring is a college graduate who by virtue of having gone through four years of college, regardless of major is considered trainable. Many of these companies or organizations that hire undergraduate students usually have some training program in place that help these students hone in on the business skills and competencies that those companies need their employees to have. Unfortunately, some professors who want to change career from one discipline to the other forget the training component of this equation.

    In academia you are expected to teach in a particular discipline which requires some broad knowledge of the general area you are teaching and a deep knowledge in the particular discipline you teach. When you go to teach accounting, marketing, finance, or management strategy for example, you are expected to have a broad knowledge of business administration and a deep knowledge in the particular discipline you teach. This is why most PhD programs in business award a PhD in business administration with majors in a particular discipline. Some PhD program in business will even permit you to take a minor in a field outside business.

    The reason for the PhD in business administration is because, as a PhD in Finance for example, you are expected to understand how finance, accounting, management and marketing interact to support good business decisions. When you earn a PhD in a field outside business, say for example, Geography, without any formal training or exposure to business, and you are teaching in a business school, you probably would not understand the basic principles of business to fully relate Geography to business. That is why the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) evaluates faculty credentials based on the faculty member holding an earned PhD in the discipline or a related discipline or a Masters degree with a major in the discipline, or a Masters degree with a concentration in the discipline (here concentration is determined by earning eighteen graduate hours) in the discipline the individual teaches.

    From what have been published, the new Dean of SBI has a Master of Business Administration degree in Marketing from the University of Chicago. A MBA in Marketing provides her with broad foundation in Business and her majoring in Marketing provides her with the depth required by SACS. Once she has acquired the breadth provided by the MBA degree, her interdisciplinary PhD can be classified as a related area of business, depending on how she selected her course work and the area of her emphasis in her dissertation. I will be surprised that since she had earned a MBA before going for the PhD degree, that her dissertation will not have a business slant.

    What is very disheartening is that some professors with non-business degrees would want to stay in the business school but are not willing to invest the time and efforts necessary to take business courses that will enable them understand the theoretical foundation of business administration. Companies hire engineers, pharmacists, Physicists and other talents from non-business disciplines and as they progress through the corporate ladder send them to business school to study business. These individuals were the people for which the Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree was originally created. If businesses and organizations would recognize the need for their employees with non-business degree to obtain a business degree, it bothers me when these stragglers who come to business school from other disciplines refuse to take legitimate courses necessary to build their business foundation.

    ReplyDelete
  42. To Blogger #43 and to all other visitors to this site

    My name is NANDA SHRESTHA and I am the PROFESSOR AND GEOGRAPHER within SBI to whom Blogger #43 made a reference in his entry. I think I know who this particular blogger. This venom-filled personal attack from him or from one of his associates comes as no surprise because he has done this many times before. I am used to his insane tirade.

    I usually do not engage in trash talking that this blogger obviously enjoys.

    Somebody had alerted me to this blog site. I have visited this particular blog section on SBI's new dean. My visit took place a few days when it had only 16 or 17 entries. I did not enjoy reading all those unflattering remarks about our new dean. And all those remarks were being expressed even before she officially joined the SBI family. That, I think, was wrong.

    Interestingly, the day before yesterday, I received a call from a couple of colleagues asking me to read the comments about the new dean. They said that there werre some 40 comments. But I waited until this afternoon to visit the site and read those comments.

    To say the least, I was very shocked and dismayed by what has been said. Comments apparently go beyond Dr. McKinley-Floyd as they include the associate and assistant deans. Now there is even one on me although my name is not mentioned. (What a dubious honor!). Everybody at SBI knows who it is. Thanks Blogger #43 for drawing me into this fray.

    Let me get to the point: When I reached Blog entry #42 and read it, I suddenly felt the chill running down my leggs. It was numbing because I deeply sensed that those at SBI would immediately link me to this particular entry because of its content.

    Here I am, deliberately trying very hard to stay away from any entanglement with the negative issues associated with SBI. I am already in big trouble regarding SACS, and I know that very very well. I have not lost my sanity, at least not yet, to get in any more trouble. I adhere to my father's dictum that when you are in trouble, don't draw any attention to yourself.

    Unfortunately, I am now being implicated and drawn into this mess and having to publicly deny what I have not done to begin with.

    Personally, I am upset at the person who entered Blog #42. First, it looks like I did it when I did not. Second, it implicitly suggests that Dr. McKinley-Floyd's PhD degree in interdisciplinary studies might be questionable when the entry says that there is no Interdisciplinary Studies Program at Emory University. Such a suggestion is wrong and misguided.

    Dr. Mckinley-Floyd never claimed in her vita that she received her PhD degree from the Department of Indisciplinary Studies. Her vita suggests that her degree is interdiciplinary because of her interdiciplinary focus. In fact, a couple days ago, I was doing some internet search on African American consumers for a paper I am working on. I happened to see a refeence to her dissertation. I managed to track it down through ProQuest and was able to download (only) the first chapter of the dissertation. Based on the introduction chapter I read, I can tell that it is a great piece. It is certainly indisciplinary in its approach and the focus is on Atlanta's elite African American women, including their consumer behaviors; the mothodology is ethnographic and clear and conceptualization thorough. I would, especially being a geographer who has done a significant amount of ethnographic-anthropological field research, never question her degree and intellectually integrity. In fact, I highly appreciate the fresh perspective it brings to the field of marketing (her MBA focus). In fact, once I saw a quote in Time magazine that said marketing is anthropology.

    However, Blogger #43 automatically assumed that I wrote Blog #42. Let me once again categorically deny that I did not write that blog. And I have no intention of engaging in character assination through blogs or in any other forms. I'll leave that to Blogger #43 since he enjoys breeding and nurturing the culture of character assination. Me, whatever I have to say, I say it openly, and I am direct, in fact, one of my serious weaknesses.

    Well, Mr. #43, if you have the courage, come forward and expose yourself, and then we can both go see somebody who administers lie-detector tests. I am willing to subject myself to a lie-detector test. And you do the same to prove to Dean Mckinley-Floyd that you did not write #43.

    HAVE YOU NO SHAME MR #43 TO CONTINUE TO DEFAME ME IN THE WAY YOU HAVE DONE OVER THE YEARS (THIS TIME HIDING BEHIND THE TAG OF ANNONYMITY TO AVOID GETTING IN LEGAL TROUBLE; I ALSO KNOW HOW HARD YOU ARE TRYING TO GET RID OF ME BY USING SACS CRITERIA WHICH YOU DON'T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND). IT IS TRANSPARENT THAT YOU ARE NOW (ALREADY) TRYING TO TURN OUR NEW DEAN AGAINST ME LIKE YOU DID WITH DR. PATRICK LIVERPOOL. IF THAT'S WHAT GIVES YOU YOUR MORNING FIX, BE MY GUEST.

    Before I conclude this blog, I would like to draw public attention to one thing you wrote in your blog:

    "......it bothers me when these STRAGGLERS (me and who else?) who come to business school from other disciplines refuse to take legitimate courses necessary to build their business foundation."

    Good shot, my friend. Now you call me a "straggler" a discipline jumper and claim that I "refuse to take legitimate courses to build my business foundation."

    First of all, please don't lie to serve your narrow agenda. Have some intellectual honesty for your own sake: I did not "straggle" (to use your word) into business and SBI. You know very well I was intentionally recruited by Dean Mobley to teach the courses I teach. I was given a 12-month contrat to lure me away from my previous insitution. I did not apply for the job prior to being interviewed. I applied after the interview because it was necessary. If you still refuse to accept this fact, why don't ask Dr. Beal who is the one who gave my name to Dean Mobley in response to her inquiry about a qualified geographer to teach the course I teach at SBI. If you had so much beef about a geographer being in the school of business, why did you not tell her to get rid of me before I was tenured and promoted at SBI, when there was a legitimate chance to do so?

    You are being a hypocrit. If you had such a disdain for geography and for me, why did you ask me to write you a letter of recommendation when you were applying for tenure and promotion?

    Please don't play ignorant to make your point. You know well that "taking legitimate (whatever that means!) courses" is just one way to become informed. There are many other ways one can enhance the foundation of their knowledge, whatever field that knowledge might be in, for example, self-learning, reading, writing, etc. By any chance, is it possible that you are attacking me because you can't accept the fact that as a "geographer" -- a disciplinary "straggler" as you prefer to label me -- I have published articles in your "business" field and plan to do so as long as I can. Or, perhaps, you can't stand it, especially in light of the fact that you are not even academically qualified in accordance with the AACSB standards on faculty? At least that was the case as of spring 2006. But that's not my fault.

    Instead of wasting time on character-assassinating me or name-calling me, it would better to increase your research productivity, become academically qualified and further the process of our accreditation which we badly need. We would all greatly appreciate your efforts and personal commitment to accreditation as it would enhance our stature and standing.

    I don't want to belabor my point for an "enlightened colleague/ academician" like you. However, if you want to test my business knowledge in an open setting, you and I -- or whoever else wants to join -- can organize a public forum where we can exchange/debate a wide range of issues concerning the global economy and global business and see how we do.

    I don't need defend myself as to why I am at SBI and how I contribute to its educational mission. I will let my work and my students and my overall contributions to SBI over the years do the talking on my behalf.

    Please don't demonstrate your insanity so publicly. I genuinely believe in my heart that you are a much better person than what you project to be or the way you are behaving. What do you have to gain anyway by berating me time and again. You do this because I have chosen the path of no response? I have done nothing to you. I have thought hard to see if I ever did anything to you -- even something inadvertently -- but nothing comes to my mind. If you are aware of something that I have done to you, then let me know and we can talk and clear the air. Trust me I hold no grudges against you despite what you have done to me time and again. I know one day you will find Jesus in your heart, not just on Sunday mornings.

    But I do want you know that, yes, I am a geographer and I am very proud of my academic background, for it allows me things globally and to do what I do at SBI and for my students. I am also equally proud of being a part of the SBI family and doing whatever I can to raise its standards and image.

    Nanda Shrestha, Professor
    School of Business & Industry
    Florida A&M University

    ReplyDelete
  43. She left CAU because she was smart to recognize that CAU was in a worse mess than FAMU can ever be. What with a president who has no clue and who appointed (against the recommendation of the search committee) a Business School Dean without a Business degree, and who is trying to buy a PHD at an online school (The CAU B-School Dean claims he is a PHD candidate at Cappella University). The faculty, alumni and students at CAU will gladly trade places with FAMU. Count your blessings because your search committee had the good sense not to select the CAU dean (who I understand also applied at FAMU)as your new Dean. Give your new Dean a chance, she has the nergy, experience and personality to get the accreditation job done. will surely deliv

    ReplyDelete
  44. it's good to see this information in your post, i was looking the same but there was not any proper resource, thanx now i have the link which i was looking for my research.

    ReplyDelete
Post a Comment

#buttons=(Accept !) #days=(20)

Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. Check Now
Accept !