FAMU received $66,611,060 in its “General Revenue” line item
for 2015-2016. That is the smallest since 2012, when FAMU finished the session
with $65,584,450 in general revenue.
The decline in FAMU’s general revenue dollars for this year
wasn’t caused by across-the-board appropriations cuts in the SUS. It was a result of the FAMU administration's decision to back a Board of Governors
(BOG) proposal to create a new budget entity for the FAMU-FSU College of
Engineering.
Both chambers of the legislature originally placed $12,996,539
for the College of Engineering in the FAMU general revenue budget at the start
of the 2015 session. FAMU would have had $79,607,599 for that line item this
year if the money had stayed there.
But on February 19, FAMU President Elmira Mangum gave her
support to a BOG proposal that asked the legislature to create a new budget entity
for the FAMU-FSU College of Engineering. The proposal said that the new budget entity would “include all operating funds
for the Joint College, including the appropriate amount of plant operation and
maintenance funds.”
The appropriations subcommittees for the Florida House of
Representatives and the Senate shifted the $12,996,539 for the College of
Engineering from FAMU’s general revenue line item to the new budget entity
entitled “FAMU/FSU College of Engineering” in March.
Florida State University has received a separate appropriation
for the College of Engineering for years. It was a total of $5 million in 2014. That
separate FSU budget is still part of that university’s general revenue appropriation
and was not moved into the new budget entity.
The General Appropriations Act doesn’t include language that
specifies which institution is charge of the new budget entity for the College of
Engineering. If FAMU stops managing the engineering money and can no longer count
those funds as a part of its overall budget, it could have an affect on the university’s
bond rating. Investor services regularly take a university’s overall cash flow
into consideration when they make their bond rating decisions.