SACS Standard 3.2.4 states that each member’s governing
board must be “free from undue influence from political, religious, or other
external bodies and [protect] the institution from such influence.”
Rufus had called for Ammons to be placed on administrative
leave only seven days before the governor made his statement in support of the same proposal.
He declined to criticize Scott for placing FAMU’s accreditation in danger. But
yesterday, Rufus appeared to be very anxious to remind a group of FAMU alumni lawmakers
about SACS Standard 3.2.4.
“We are writing to ask that Mr. Rufus Montgomery voluntarily
resign his post as Chairman of the Florida Agricultural & Mechanical
University (FAMU) Board of Trustees (BOT). If the Chairman is unwilling to do
so, we request that you exercise your authority under Article 3 of the FAMU BOT
Operating Procedures and remove him as an officer of the Board as soon as
possible,” the letter said.
The group added that “the chairman has consistently used his
position to overreach into the day-to-day management of the University – a role
reserved for the president.” That statement suggested that the chairman wasn’t
following SACS Standard 3.2.6., which says that the policy-making job of the
board of a school must remain distinct from the job of the administration to
oversee the execution of policies.
Rufus fired back with a statement that hinted that the group
of lawmakers might hurt FAMU’s ability to abide by SACS Standard 3.2.4, which says
university boards must stay free from political interference.
“For the good of the institution and to prevent charges of
undue political interference, I hope that our elected officials will allow our
Board to do the job we were appointed to do.”
The chairman said that he would not resign and called
attention to his recent 11-0 reelection to lead the Board of Trustees.
“I will honor the decision and level of confidence that
Board members showed in my leadership earlier this month when they unanimously
re-elected me to a full two-year term as chairman. While certain elected
officials have always stood behind FAMU, their vantage point doesn’t afford
them the same level of interaction or responsibility required of the chairman of
the Board and other trustees,” he said.