Back when Derry Harper, former inspector general for the Florida
Board of Governors (BOG), released a report that criticized FAMU for permitting
ineligible students to march with its band, reporters across the state jumped
to put it in the news.
Associated Press reporter Gary Fineout typed up a story that
ran with the headline: “Hazing rules ignored before death at FAMU.” The Orlando
Sentinel wrote “State report blasts FAMU’s effort to fight hazing before
Champion’s death.” The Tallahassee Democrat published an article that said “BOG
report is critical of FAMU.”
But Fineout, the Sentinel, and the Democrat haven’t made
a peep about the Florida auditor general’s finding that the BOG failed to verify
that Harper had the legally required eligibility qualifications for
his own job.
Harper resigned shortly after Martin notified the BOG of its
noncompliance with that Florida law. But Fineout, the Sentinel, and the Democrat
have written nothing about the auditor general’s report, even though it came
out more than three months ago. They all also looked the other way when the
auditor general released a 2012 operational audit that said the BOG put
students at risk by failing to adopt a detailed regulation that sets specific
minimum standards for anti-hazing programs at State University System of
Florida schools.
Gary Fineout, the Orlando Sentinel, and Tallahassee Democrat
constantly tell their readers about state reports that call for the FAMU Board
of Trustees to exercise greater accountability. But they have pretended like
the recent Florida auditor general reports demanding greater accountability for
the Florida Board of Governors don’t exist.
What is the lurking beneath these decisions to treat the
FAMU Board of Trustees and Florida Board of Governors so differently? What is
behind these choices to regularly ignore critical state reports about the BOG but
publicize critical state reports about FAMU? Whatever it is, it’s wrong.