The four categories were personal characteristics and values,
organizational management, internal relations, and board and governance
relations.
On a scale of 1 to 100, when you fail four categories, that
gives you a 60 percent,” Rufus said.
He said a 90-day performance improvement plan could be a way
to deal with that problem.
Committee Chairwoman Kimberly Moore said she thought that the
proposal was outside the set of duties that had been assigned to the
Presidential Evaluation Committee. Rufus declined to offer the plan as a motion
before the committee but didn’t rule out introducing it at the upcoming full
meeting of the Board of Trustees.
The committee did approve a motion by Rufus that requires
Mangum to give the board a monthly report about her progress in meeting the objectives
that the committee had discussed with her.
Mangum told the committee that “I’m committed to the
institutional progress, but I find myself somewhat at a loss based upon some of
the standards that we just set at 60 percent meeting success, especially as it
relates to the university’s work plan and its performance with regard to
student graduation, retention, and a few other metrics.”