Sen. Joseph Abruzzo, D-Boynton Beach, introduced the bill on
July 31. It does not specify a payment amount. But the Orlando Sentinel
reported nine days before the bill was filed that the Champion family had offered
to settle its wrongful death lawsuit against FAMU for $8 million. A civil trial
is scheduled to begin in October.
FAMU offered the Champions $300,000 in 2012, but the family
rejected it. The Florida sovereign immunity law sets $300,000 as the most that
state universities can pay as part of a legal proceeding. Higher amounts must
come from a claims bill passed by Florida Legislature. A claims bill that Sen. Bill Montford, D-Tallahassee, filed for the Champion parents in 2013 did not receive approval from the legislature.
Abruzzo’s claims bill refers to Harper’s 2012 investigation
report about the FAMU anti-hazing program in three of its paragraphs. It includes a statement noting that the report
said “that band member eligibility was seldom, if ever, verified.”
Harper abruptly resigned as the BOG inspector general in
2013 after state auditors demanded proof that he was legally eligible to hold
his own job.
David W. Martin, the Florida auditor general, scolded the BOG
for “noncompliance with statutory requirements” in a 2013 quality assessment
review of its inspector general’s office. As part of that finding, he said the
BOG failed to provide verification that Harper had the educational
qualifications required by Florida law.
On June 10, 2013, seven days after the date of then-BOG
Chancellor Frank Brogan’s response to the preliminary report for that audit, the Tallahassee
Democrat reported that Harper had resigned.
Abruzzo has not explained why he decided to reference Harper’s
report despite that problem that the state auditors flagged before Harper stepped down as the BOG inspector general.
Former Florida Chief Justice Charles Wells ripped Harper’s
work in a court filing he made in support of FAMU on Wednesday, January 16,
2013. He told the judge that Harper’s report was “incompetent, unauthenticated
and inadmissible hearsay.” Those comments came months before the state auditors informed the BOG of their preliminary findings regarding the Office of the Inspector General.
Read the full 2013 state review of the BOG inspector
general’s office here.