Most FAMU trustees gave Mangum a “Does Not Meet” expectations
rating for four out of the eleven categories on her annual evaluation. The four
categories were external relations, internal relations, board and governance
relations, and personal characteristics and values.
Those final three categories were also the ones on which
Mangum received a “Does Not Meet” expectations rating in her 2014-2015 evaluation. That year, the majority of the trustees also gave her a “Does Not
Meet” expectations rating on organizational management. But she improved in that
category to “Meets” expectations for 2015-2016.
Back when the BOT discussed Mangum’s evaluation in 2015,
then-Chairman Rufus Montgomery said: “On a scale of 1 to 100, when you fail
four categories, that gives you a 60 percent.”
Mangum continues to see her own performance very differently
from the BOT. She did not give herself any “Does Not Meet” expectations ratings in
either of the two annual self-evaluations she has completed. She gave herself
an “Exceeds” expectations rating on five categories in 2014-2015 and four categories
in 2015-2016.