The ruling triggered national outrage from many who believe the
verdict is unjust. A large number of FAMU students were among those who shared
this view. That night, university officials said that the campus was still calm
despite reports of “an incident” near the school.
“After the Trayvon Martin verdict, a notice earlier this
evening identified an incident near campus,” FAMU said in press statement. “As
of 11:30 p.m. the FAMU campus is calm and there are no safety related issues or
concerns reported. FAMU students are preparing for a peaceful march.”
According to the USA Today, "Hundreds of students from FAMU, Florida State University, Tallahassee Community College and other members of the community answered the call to protest the verdict at the Florida Capitol... The protesters met at the Leon County Civic Center at midnight [on Sunday, July 14] and marched for several blocks before reaching the Capitol. In remembrance of Trayvon Martin, half of the march took place in silence. The rest of the way, participants chanted and sang hymns."
The peaceful reaction from FAMU’s students paralleled U.S. President Barack Obama’s call for “calm reflection” and increased vigilance against gun violence.
The U.S. Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Eric
Holder, announced that it will review Martin’s killing in order to determine if
there are grounds for legal action by the federal government.
“As the Department first acknowledged last year, we have an
open investigation into the death of Trayvon Martin,” a USDOJ statement said. “The
Department of Justice’s Criminal Section of the Civil Rights Division, the
United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida, and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation continue to evaluate the evidence generated
during the federal investigation, as well as the evidence and testimony from
the state trial. Experienced federal prosecutors will determine whether the
evidence reveals a prosecutable violation of any of the limited federal
criminal civil rights statutes within our jurisdiction, and whether federal
prosecution is appropriate in accordance with the Department’s policy governing
successive federal prosecution following a state trial.”