FAMU unresponsive to auditors
In a letter dated May 11, 2006, addressed to FAMU Interim President Castell Bryant, state auditors asked the University to turn over “documentation/information” for nine items necessary to complete the University’s 2005 Financial Audit. Auditors pointed out that they’d originally requested these documents during a working conference with FAMU on April 26, 2006.
Click on screenshots of letter to make bigger.
Among the nine (9) items questioned are the following:
• For 40 journal entries totaling $85,206,212, documentation evidencing how the journal entry amounts were determined and the purpose of the entries is needed.
• For 29 journal entries totaling $56,450,202, documentation evidencing that the entries had been reviewed and approved by appropriate University employees prior to being posted to the accounting system is needed.
• For a journal entry that increased cash, and decreased contracts and grants receivable, by a cumulative amount of $2,452,033, the following information/documentation for certain components of the entry is needed:
a. Amounts collected per the Student Financial System (SFS) module, amounts collected as posted to the general ledger, and variances between SFS and general ledger for 722 deposit identification numbers shown on a schedule supporting a $1,866,855 cash increase.
b. An explanation for an $855,573 cash increase, and documentation evidencing that University personnel investigated and resolved this difference prior to posting this entry on the general ledger.
c. For a $8,296,507 cash decrease that was reportedly based on deposits recorded in the Contracts and Grants module that could not be matched with a deposit posted to the bank statement, documentation evidencing that the University investigated the entries to determine that such entries were made in error.
• The University used a calculated amount of $36,849,466 or cash collections in determining the contracts and grants receivable balance at fiscal year end, reportedly based on a comparison of amounts recorded in the general ledger with a list of deposits per bank statements maintained by the Assistant Director of Contracts and Grants. However, the amount of deposits per the Assistant Director’s list totaled $41,630,600, a difference of $4,781,134. An explanation of the difference is needed, as well as documentation supporting the methodology used in calculating the cash collections so that we can trace reported collections to deposits posted to bank statements and to the general ledger.
The auditors emphatically stated that the requested “documentation/information is required for us (auditors) to render an opinion on whether the University’s financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.” They continued, “…unless such documentation supports amounts reported on the University’s financial statements or recorded in the University’s accounting records, and is presented in a manner that allows audit staff to readily determine the validity of the documentation/information, we may be unable to render an opinion on the University’s financial statements for fiscal year ended June 30, 2005.”
The letter from state auditors was copied to: Challis Lowe, Board Chair; Pam Duncan, Chair, BOT Audit Committee; Gerald Dunn, CFO, VP Administration and Fiscal Affairs; and Rufus Little, III, VP for Audit and Compliance.
In all, state auditors were question $620,909,120 worth of journal entries and transfers by FAMU. To date, FAMU still has not provided state auditors with the information that they requested. Auditors are proceeding to write their report without FAMU’s input.
$620 million dollars in question? Our annual operating budget is only $400 million. What the hell has this university administration been doing with FAMU's books?
ReplyDeleteThe St. Pete Times wrote that FAMU was on the "brink of financial disaster" when the auditors found a much smaller discrepency in the books that Fred Gainous kept.
FAMUans, we are about to take the worst state and national press beating in our recent history.
Heaven help us!
Ms. Bryant, pay back every dime of your salary increase and bonus, IMMEDIATELY!!!!
ReplyDeleteThis is a doggone shame...but we will weather the storm.
ReplyDeleteIf we're to weather the storm, then we need a new captain and crew to steer this ship (FAMU). Bryant and her motley band of pirates need to walk the plank.
ReplyDeleteRuffus get to work!
ReplyDeleteCastell is worst than Gainous!
ReplyDeleteYeah, Rufus. Instead of jumping to your own defense on this blog everyday, you should have been doing your job in Audit and Compliance. Now look what's happening!
ReplyDeleteIsn't Gerald Dunn supposed to be a super number-crunching consultant? Who were his references?
ReplyDeleteLockheed Martin loan him to us. :(
ReplyDeleteI think Gerald Dunn's references came from Enron and Morris Brown College.
ReplyDeleteYou mean to tell me, we paid KPMG millions of dollars to f--k up our books. This is a f--king shame.
ReplyDeleteI am so pissed, I feel like slapping Castell's 'fro straight and Challis' bug eyes crooked.
These two need their collective arses kicked all the way back down to Miami. And on the way to the bottom, Castell need to stop by the bank and give us our damn money.
All this time, she been telling lies left and right.
It's time for her arse to go.
Signed,
Kathleen Bates
It's official. We have clowns in our controller's office and a ringmaster in the president's chair.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we can convince Florida State to change their colors to Garnet and Green to acknowledge our history after the merger.
ReplyDeleteIt's all over.
Well the glossy publication from the dark into light, should read from the light into the dark.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if RN can post and compare some of the facts she stated about our finances in that publication against this audit?
I am convinced that a community college leader just can't cut it at FAMU or any other university for that matter.
I guess the university setting is like a foreign country to Castell and Gainous.
I thought we would never have another president as bad as Gainous, but back-to-back and in one Century.
This is some bad Karma.
What did we do to deserve these two fools?
Gainous wasn't given half a chance to be classified as good or bad but, Castell is just plain out and out bad.
ReplyDeleteAnd Lowe has the audacity to consider that woman for permanent President? Something is defintely rotten on the yard or either Bryant found Lowe's g-spot.
I think we should steer away from comments regarding their personal (sexual) lives.
ReplyDeleteUnless it has been proven and is public that it is influencing their decision making.
Yeah, let's keep the comments clean and respectful...
ReplyDeleteFive different responses. Either the Queen "B" has a multi million surplus or not.
ReplyDeleteAll WE want to know is have the audit of the financial statements been completed?
That's a simple yes or no.
For it to be that level ($620M), there was a policy and procedural error in some routine journal entries that was repeated month after month. I would think it would be obvious and correctible.
ReplyDeleteWhat we need is a big time CFO as much as we need a big time president. Right now, we have neither.
This audit is in bad shape. What has Rufus Little been doing besides reading Rattler Nation and taking pot shots at its posters?
ReplyDeleteIsn't he the DC chapter president?
ReplyDeleteThis brother is really busy.
How can he keep up with compliances and audits running back and forth to DC?